Purchasing a CMM represents a substantial investment for many companies, and understanding the many factors involved can be daunting. To make a truly educated decision takes advanced expertise in dimensional metrology and years of experience in quality inspection at a high level. Some companies gloss over the necessity of such an investment or even skip outsourcing inspection altogether, but not knowing when it’s best to bring the CMM process in-house vs. outsourcing can present a wide range of risks, such as issues with the company’s production quality and burning through precious funds and resources.
IIA aims to help companies decide on the right CMM without having to do hours and hours of research. Although we always recommend that companies do their homework when deciding on such mission-critical equipment, we want to help make it easier for companies to know when is the right time to invest in a CMM, or if it’s even necessary at all. Would they be better off outsourcing the CMM inspection process to an independent laboratory? Or would it be better to bring this part of the quality inspection process in-house (or somewhere in between)? What are the hidden costs? Do they have the right personnel to program, operate, and maintain a CMM? Do they require CMM quality verification regularly (in addition to periodic calibration)? IIA wants to make it as simple as possible. Check out our questionnaire below to see the question companies SHOULD be asking when making such an important decision.
What type of probing is required? (Probing, in itself, contains a whole list of questions!)
What is the accuracy requirement? (Not all CMMs are the same!)